Technical Notes
Seawater Technical Papers

Metrological challenges for measurements of key climatological observables. Part 4: atmospheric relative humidity


Metrological challenges for measurements of key climatological observables. Part 4: atmospheric relative humidity

J W Lovell-Smith1, R Feistel2, A H Harvey3, O Hellmuth4, S A Bell5, M Heinonen6 and J R Cooper7

Published 15 December 2015 • © 2016 BIPM & IOP Publishing Ltd • 

Abstract

Water in its three ambient phases plays the central thermodynamic role in the terrestrial climate system. Clouds control Earth's radiation balance, atmospheric water vapour is the strongest 'greenhouse' gas, and non-equilibrium relative humidity at the air–sea interface drives evaporation and latent heat export from the ocean. In this paper, we examine the climatologically relevant atmospheric relative humidity, noting fundamental deficiencies in the definition of this key observable. The metrological history of this quantity is reviewed, problems with its current definition and measurement practice are analysed, and options for future improvements are discussed in conjunction with the recent seawater standard TEOS-10. It is concluded that the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), in cooperation with the International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam (IAPWS), along with other international organizations and institutions, can make significant contributions by developing and recommending state-of-the-art solutions, such as are suggested here, for what are long-standing metrological problems.

List of symbols

Symbol

Quantity

a

vector of fitted parameters

aW

relative activity of water

b

vector of fitted parameters

e

pure water-vapour pressure

pure water-vapour pressure at saturation

FeF f

saturation reference functions

f

water-vapour enhancement factor

fugacity of water in vapour phase

fugacity of water in vapour phase at saturation

fugacity of water in liquid phase

k

uncertainty coverage factor

MA

molar mass of dry air = 0.028 965 46 kg mol−1

mass of dry air

MW

molar mass of water = 0.018 015 268 kg mol−1

mass of water vapour

p

absolute pressure

pressure at saturation

water-vapour partial pressure

reference partial pressure of water vapour

saturation partial pressure of water vapour

q

specific humidity

qsat

specific humidity at saturation

R

molar gas constant = 8.314 462 1 J K−1 mol−1

specific gas constant of water = R / MW

r

mixing ratio

rsat

mixing ratio at saturation

s

saturation condition

T

absolute temperature, ITS-90

Td

dew-point temperature

x

mole fraction of water vapour

mole fraction water vapour at saturation

xW

mole fraction of liquid water

z

humidity quantity (with superscripts)

fugacity coefficient of water vapour

λ

absolute activity

μ

chemical potential (with super/subscripts)

Poynting correction factor of liquid water

ω

ratio of molar masses of water and dry air

ψ

relative humidity (with super/subscripts)

ψext

relative humidity in the extended range

1. Introduction

As part of a series of papers examining metrological challenges for measurements of key climatological observables (Feistel et al 2016, Pawlowicz et al 2016, Dickson et al 2016), in this paper we examine atmospheric relative humidity. The term humidity indicates water vapour, normally admixed with air or other dry gas. Above liquid water and aqueous solutions, above ice, and in pore spaces lined with adsorbed water, water vapour will be found, often with an interface-crossing net flux of molecules. The irreversible net flux only ceases at equilibrium, at which point the chemical potential, μ, of each component is the same in all coexisting phases. The vapour-phase water mole fraction, , where  and , respectively, are the numbers of water and air molecules, at equilibrium depends primarily on the temperature, T, but also on the curvature of the interface between gas and liquid, the surface material, the gas mixture, the substances dissolved in the condensed phase and on the total pressure, p. If at equilibrium the condensed phase—either liquid water or ice—has a planar interface with the vapour phase, the vapour (or more loosely, the humid gas) is said to be saturated and the system at saturation.

In general, the relative humidity (RH), ψ, of humid air8 is the ratio of some non-negative humidity quantity, z, to the same quantity at saturation, zsat, at the same temperature, i.e.,

Equation (1)

where the superscript '(s)' indicates that the conditions at saturation need be specified as an additional relation imposed on the independent quantities  and . Choices for z have included the water-vapour mole fraction, x, the mixing ratio, , the specific humidity, , the pure water vapour pressure, e, the water-vapour partial pressure, , and the fugacity of water vapour, . Here,  and  represent the masses of water vapour and dry air, respectively, in a unit volume. A preferred choice for s has been , i.e., saturation is established via an isobaric process in contrast to, say, isothermal compression or vapour injection at constant volume. The subscript V is used here to distinguish fugacity from the common symbol f for the water-vapour enhancement factor. When expressing RH in percent, the unit symbol %rh will be used in this paper.

Note, however, that equation (1) requires the specification of a saturated gas phase in order to calculate z(T); this condition is not trivially obeyed under any practical circumstances and essentially constricts the generality of possible RH definitions by the form of equation (1). To date, the most important definition has set , which with  is equivalent to . Thisde facto standard definition (as it will be referred to in this paper) has been authorized by the WMO9 since 1950 and by many other organizations (see section 3.2). However, the standard definition is valid only over a limited range, and attempts to create full-range definitions have lacked both clear theoretical basis and official sanction. Finally, a variety of other non-standard definitions (e.g., with  and ) continue to propagate in particular in climatological and meteorological textbooks or research articles.

We present in section 2 a brief review of the importance of relative humidity in climate dynamics, and emphasize the related need for its unambiguous definition and consistent measurement, traceable to the International System of Units, the SI. Apparently self-evident, this requirement is by no means a metrologically well-settled subject, as is evident from the history reviewed in section 3. In sections 4 and 5, the core of this paper provides an analysis of the various inconsistent definitions in use for relative humidity, especially in geophysical and climate research (Katsaros 2001), which neither cover the complete range of reasonable applicability (Böse and Mitter 2004, Lovell-Smith and Pearson 2006) nor represent physically rigorous measures of the thermodynamic driving force to equilibrium. To provide a consistent solution to these long-standing problems, we suggest in section 6 an axiomatic approach based on equations of state for humid air, liquid water and ice that are parts of TEOS-10, the Thermodynamic Equation of Seawater 2010 (IOC et al 2010). This approach is supported by an explicit example specified in appendix D in the supplement of the part 1 companion paper (Feistel et al 2016).

2. Climatological relevance

Hypothetically, our early ancestors developed sweating for effective cooling in the hot but arid African savannah, likely more than a million years ago (Rantala 2007). At least since then, the spatially and temporally widely varying amounts of water vapour in the air of the terrestrial climate zones from deserts to jungles have influenced our social evolution, our living conditions, agriculture, technology, ways of life and even our spoken language (Everett et al 2015). As a result of this variety, humidity problems are investigated today in various branches of science and engineering, from air conditioning to weather forecast.

Water is a key player in terrestrial climate dynamics; Heinrich Hertz in 1885 was perhaps the first who painted the physical picture of climate as a 'gigantic steam engine' (Mulligan and Hertz 1997, p 41). Related knowledge is still insufficient because processes involving water in the atmosphere are very complex, theoretically and observationally demanding, and subject to significant uncertainties (Chahine 1992, Schneider et al 2010, Randall 2012, Gimeno 2013, Josey et al 2013). In contrast to the greenhouse effect, the hydrological cycle has received only marginal attention in the recent public debates on global warming related to carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. For example, the observed seasonal cycle of ocean temperatures cannot be explained by merely the radiation balance without latent heat export which, similar to that of the sweaty human skin, is controlled by ambient RH (Kraus 1972, Feistel and Ebeling 2011, Pierce et al 2011).

2.1. Greenhouse feedback of water-vapour amount

Water vapour is the Earth's main greenhouse gas—and usefully so. Without it, average temperatures would be uncomfortably colder (Le Treut et al 2007). But unlike human-made CO2emissions, water-vapour emissions generally cannot be controlled: surface water evaporates everywhere, in amounts governed mostly by temperature, wind and humidity. Atmospheric water vapour forms clouds and falls as rain, when temperature, pressure and air movements dictate. To the terrestrial greenhouse effect, i.e., to the atmospheric absorption of outgoing thermal radiation, CO2 actually contributes only one quarter while the major part comes mainly from water vapour and from clouds (Abbot and Fowle 1908, Emden 1913, Trenberth et al 2007, Lacis et al 2010, Schmidt et al 2010).

On average per surface area, liquid water in clouds amounts to about 0.11 kg m−2 (Greenwald and Stephens 1995), a fraction slightly less than 0.5% of the total water mass of about 25 kg m−2contained in the vertically integrated air column. About twice as much water as in clouds resides in the stratosphere above the 'cold trap' tropopause (Seidel 2002), while about 98% constitutes moisture confined to the troposphere below, where it strongly absorbs and emits infrared radiation (Sugiyama et al 2005). The increasing amount of tropospheric water, which is assumed to result from global warming, in turn amplifies the temperature rise via a positive feedback loop (Komabayasi 1967, Ingersoll 19692013, Dessler et al 2008, Dessler 2010, Ingram 2010, Pierrehumbert 2010, Soares 2010). About 80% to 90% of global evaporation originates from the ocean (Reid and Valdés 2011, Durack et al 2013). The moisture content of the air column over the ocean has increased by 0.41 kg m−2 or 1.6% per decade since 1988 (Santer et al 2007), in accord with a mean warming rate of 13 mK yr−1 of the marine atmosphere (Trenberth et al2007). Along with the increase in precipitable water, atmospheric circulation seems to be slowing down (Coumou et al 2015, Laliberté et al 2015).

2.2. Relative fugacity driving the hydrological cycle

On the annual average, 72% of the Earth's cross section exposed to sunlight is covered by the ocean (Feistel 2013) where about 60% of the solar energy is absorbed (Macdonald and Baringer2013) and subsequently exported to the atmosphere by radiation, by sensible heat flux and by latent heat of evaporation controlled by RH. Largely unaffected by tropospheric CO2 levels, latent heat energy is carried by water vapour across the dense layers of the atmosphere before it is released in clouds and radiated to the cold cosmic background. The dominant role of this transport route in the global energy balance is not always clearly emphasized in climatological literature; the following estimates regarding the three mechanisms of oceanic heat loss may underpin this role and in turn that of RH.

Estimates for the latent-heat fraction of ocean-atmosphere energy exchange vary between 45% (Emery et al 2006) and 90% (Wells 2012). The mean oceanic evaporation of about 1200 mm yr−1(Baumgartner and Reichel 1975, Peixoto and Oort 1992) corresponds to a latent heat export rate of approximately 100 W m−2, or to roughly 2/3 of the solar irradiation absorbed in the water column (Feistel and Ebeling 2011, Pierce et al 2011). On land, the latent heat flux is dominated by transpiration that amounts to 33 W m−2 (Jasechko et al 2013), or to about 1/2 of the irradiation absorbed there (Trenberth et al 2009). Thus, driven by atmospheric subsaturation measured in terms of RH, evaporation is the dominant process of oceanic energy export (Pierrehumbert1996). In contrast, even if any greenhouse effect is ignored, black-body radiation from the ocean surface is too slow to explain the observed oceanic thermal relaxation time of only 2–3 months (Prescott and Collins 1951, Schwartz 2007, Feistel and Ebeling 2011) and may not dominate ocean cooling. Finally, sensible heat flow is driven by the sea–air temperature difference such as from the warm water to the colder air above. However, this difference is generally small (Kara et al 2007), and in addition, when a turbulent isentropic greenhouse atmosphere is in radiation balance with the ocean, the air temperature at the sea surface appears even slightly higher than that of the emitting water underneath, as a result of the adiabatic vertical temperature gradient (Feistel 2011a), which suggests that the average sensible heat transfer in such a conceptual model is instead downwards from the air to the sea. Also, the cool oceanic skin caused by evaporation (Saunders 1967, Schluessel et al 1990) counteracts sensible heat export. Compared to the former two processes, sensible heat exchange plays only a minor role in sea–air interaction.

In irreversible thermodynamics, fluxes of heat and matter result from Onsager forces, which are combinations of gradients of temperature and chemical potentials (de Groot and Mazur 1962, Falkenhagen et al 1971, Glansdorff and Prigogine 1971, Landau and Lifschitz 1974). Climate processes are driven by such gradients that are built up by uneven absorption of solar energy and its subsequent conversion and self-organized redistribution by radiation, phase transitions and global circulation. The most relevant differences of chemical potentials are those of water between ocean, ice cover and humid air, at the boundary of and within the atmosphere. These differences can be exactly expressed in terms of the relative fugacity (see appendix C in the digital supplement of part 1 of this series, i.e., Feistel et al 2016) of water vapour in the atmosphere, which is one of the options for defining RH. To a reasonable approximation, see section 5, the spatial distribution of the relative fugacity of water vapour can be described by that of the RH in the standard definition (Erikson 1965, Kraus 1972, Hansen and Takahashi 1984, IOC et al 2010, Feistel et al 2010b, Feistel and Ebeling 2011, Li and Chylek 2012, Li et al 2015). At the sea surface, the thermodynamic driving force for evaporation is the difference between the chemical potentials of water in the ocean and in the atmosphere (Kraus and Businger 1994, IOC et al2010). Thus, RH immediately above the sea surface essentially controls the latent heat export from the ocean. Similar to the variety of empirical equations in use for estimating RH, the driving forces for the mass transfer of water across phase boundaries are parameterized by differences of various alternative humidity quantities (Erikson 1965, Kusuda 1965, Liu and Niiler 1990, Katsaros 2001, Schneider et al 2010), motivated mainly by practical convenience rather than by physical rigour.

After averaging over diurnal cycles and weather fluctuations, RH over the oceans is rather constant at values of about 80 %rh, almost independent of region, season, or atmospheric warming (Albrecht 1940, Gill 1982, Mitchell 1989, Peixoto and Oort 1996, Allen and Ingram2002, Dai 2006, Pierrehumbert 2010), in contrast to RH in the upper troposphere (Paltridge et al2009, Fasullo and Trenberth 2012). Mean sea-surface RH is slightly higher (up to 85 %rh) in the tropics and slightly lower (down to 75 %rh) in the trade-wind belt. A global climatological atlas of ocean-surface RH was published by Wright (1988). A spurious 'decline in marine relative humidity around 1982' in climate data was caused by 'a change in reporting practice for dew-point temperature' (IPCC 2013, section 2.5.4, 'Surface Humidity', p 206). While the approximate constancy of RH is well-known from observations and models, its fundamental physical causes remain elusive (Ingram 2010, Pierrehumbert 2010, Held and Shell 2012). A simple hypothesis is that slightly deviating values of RH may drive the global energy fluxes out of balance and the resulting deviations of ocean temperature, hydrological cycle and cloudiness will quickly return RH to its observed value (Feistel 2013).

Climatological sensitivity, planetary albedo and changes in cloudiness are closely linked to changes of RH (Smagorinsky 1960, Hansen and Takahashi 1984, Fasullo and Trenberth 2012, Quaas 2012, Feistel 2013, Lea 2015, Martínez-Botí et al 2015). No significant trend for the land-ocean average of the total cloud cover was found for the period 1971–96 (Warren et al 2007). Also, no significant change in cloud albedo has yet been detected (Wielicki et al 2005); certain trends found in remotely sensed cloudiness may suffer from monitoring inadequacies (Dai et al2006). While surface RH drives the ocean's cooling, clouds and albedo control its heating by sunlight in such a way that, on the global average, gain and loss are almost perfectly balanced by a stable feedback loop. Thus, small long-term trends possibly observed in surface RH are key indicators for fundamental changes in the climate system and may offer insights in, for example, the effects of volcanic eruptions or solar activity, in the variability of the global albedo or cloudiness, and in regional acceleration of the water cycle (Durack et al 2012, Fasullo and Trenberth 2012, Held and Shell 2012, Josey et al 2013, Gimeno 2013, Bintanja and Selten 2014, Yu and Luo 2014). Cloud-climate interaction is poorly understood in general, in particular how humid air is lifted into the atmosphere and drives cloud formation and rainfall (Bony et al 2015, Schiermeier 2015). Solar dimming measures of 'geo-engineering' occasionally discussed to counteract global warming may substantially modify the atmospheric RH as a risky side-effect (Schmidt et al 2012).

All the above estimates suffer from considerable uncertainties; monitoring and modelling the latent heat flux and the related evaporative cooling still poses a challenge (Kleeman and Power1995, Pierrehumbert 19962010, Josey et al 19992013, Worley et al 2005, van Hooidonk and Huber 2009). Based on the best measurements, closing the global ocean energy budget still fails by as much as about 20%, or 30 W m−2, likely due to poor knowledge of the latent heat flux (Chahine 1992, Katsaros 2001, Stephens et al 2012, Josey et al 2013). For comparison, natural albedo fluctuations typically change solar irradiation by only about 1% (Wielicki et al 2005), while a tiny systematic imbalance on the order of 0.003%, or 0.005 W m−2, of the terrestrial heat flux is large enough to raise the atmospheric temperature at the observed rate of 2 K per century (Hansen et al 2006). Theoretically, under otherwise unaltered conditions, a minor systematic offset of 1 %rh (an uncertainty typical for meteorological observation, see section 4.3) in mean sea-surface RH would suffice to cause a significant oceanic latent heat-flux difference of almost 6 W m−2 (Feistel and Ebeling 2011). Thus, the heat-flux deviation to be monitored for global warming is about three orders of magnitude less than the uncertainty of oceanic latent-heat export estimates.

The recent pause ('hiatus') in global surface warming (Kosaka and Xie 2013, Li et al 2013, Chen and Tung 2014, Clement and DiNezio 2014, Tollefsen 2014) indicates that heat-flux fluctuations of a magnitude typical for global warming, likely caused by ocean-atmosphere interaction, may well occur on climatic time scales. Possibly related global fluctuations of RH are unclear. The disputed hiatus may be just an insignificant spurious effect within data uncertainty and natural fluctuations (Cowtan and Way 2014, Curry 2014, Kintisch 2014, Marotzke and Forster 2015, Steinman et al 2015).

2.3. Importance of atmospheric humidity to salinity and climate variability

Local and temporal changes of atmospheric humidity significantly influence the sea-surface salinity, the hydrological cycle and the climatic variability (Dai 2006, Santer et al 2007, Durack and Wijffels 2010, Durack et al 2012, Pierce et al 2012), see also Pawlowicz et al (2016). As an example, after the closing of the Isthmus of Panama about 3.5 million years ago (Coates 1997), the increasing humidity over the North Atlantic is considered responsible for the subsequent Arctic glaciation (Haug and Tiedemann 1998, Haug et al 2005). The somewhat later polar warming of between 8 K and 19 K cannot be explained by the CO2 levels that were similar to the present ones, however, uncertain additional feedbacks, in particular related to water vapour, may grow stronger in warmer climates (Lea 2015, Martínez-Botí et al 2015). Moisture dynamics also governs, e.g., the anomalies of rainy seasons in the African Sahel zone (Poan et al 2013), the yields in the US Corn Belt (Ort and Long 2014), and the climate sensitivity to CO2 (Wang et al2014). Also, atmospheric water vapour affects almost any radiation-based measurements from space. Measurement and numerical simulation of global atmospheric humidity distributions and their changes on the long-term scale are therefore fundamental for understanding and monitoring climatic change. The global water cycle is expected to become a major focus for climate research in the coming years (Sherwood et al 2010, Reid and Valdés 2011, Tollefsen 2012, Fasullo and Trenberth 2012, IPCC 2013, Stevens and Bony 2013).

3. Brief history

The scientific concept of relative humidity arose with the development of instruments (hygrometers) to measure humidity (Molyneux 1685, Arderon 1746, Gatley 2013). De Luc provided what is possibly the first formal definition of relative humidity and recognition of an underlying physical reality, noting that many natural fibre-based materials, including hygrometer sensing fibres, were observed to respond to the 'degree of saturation' (i.e., to the ratio of the actual quantity of 'steam' to the maximum possible at that temperature) rather than to the absolute quantity of water vapour (de Luc 1792, pp 412–13). Gilbert (1803) is credited with the first use of the term 'relative humidity' although a variety of ratios (e.g., density and vapour tension) and terms (e.g., 'fraction of saturation', 'degrees of saturation', 'relative degree of humidity', 'degree of moisture' and 'percentage humidity') were used throughout the 19th century (Regnault 1845, Miller 1851, Guyot 1859, Shaw 1889).

Detailed reviews of the history of atmospheric humidity measurements were published by Sonntag (1966), Möller (2008), Holland and Stöhr (2011) and Gatley (2013). The beginning of quasi-regular meteorological measurements of RH can be dated to 1873, when OMI/IMO10 was established to coordinate the collection and international exchange of meteorological data and information11. Since its invention in 1887 (Sprung 1888), Assmann's psychrometer has proven to be a robust instrument for practical meteorological observations of RH (WMO 2008). Diurnal and seasonal cycles as well as spatial variability of RH were already known at certain locations before 1873 (Brewster 1832, Forbes and Mahlmann 1836). For example, records between 1849 and 1868 of dry-bulb and wet-bulb thermometers at the Royal Observatory at Greenwich were analysed by Ellis (1878), and at the German weather station Hohenpeissenberg, where continuous RH records began in 1879 (DWD 2012), different hygrometers and a psychrometer (in 1841) had been used since 178112. Nevertheless, long-term series of RH comparable in length and quality to historical records of temperature and precipitation are 'almost not available' (Hocke et al 2013) for modern climate research.

3.1. Vapour pressure, partial pressure, fugacity and the enhancement factor

Relative-humidity definitions based on vapour pressure are not equivalent to those based on vapour density since, as was noted by Regnault (1845), the partial density of saturated water vapour in moist air is greater than the density of pure saturated vapour at the same temperature. In other words, the saturation partial pressure of water vapour in humid air, , is greater than the pressure of pure saturated water vapour, , at the same temperature. By the end of the 19th century, this enhancement of the partial pressure above  was recognized to be a combination of three thermodynamic phenomena, whereby the 'effective' water-vapour pressure (and hence evaporative flux), associated with the condensed phase, increases due to the applied pressure (Poynting effect) and decreases due to dissolved gas (colligative or Raoult effect), and whereby the 'effective' water-vapour pressure (and hence condensing flux) in the gas phase is reduced due to interactions among air and water molecules (Van der Waals 1873, Maxwell 1874, Poynting 1881, Lewis 19001901a1901b, McDonald 1963, Hyland 1975, Wisniak 2001).

Consequently, for humid air the 'effective' vapour pressure driving water transport towards equilibrium is identified with neither e nor  but with the fugacity, of water vapour relative to the fugacity of water in the other phases. The concept of fugacity, which is related to the free energy and chemical potential, was introduced in 1900 by Lewis as the tendency of a molecular species to escape from the phase it is in, such that at equilibrium the fugacities (and chemical potentials) of the species in each phase are equal. With units of pressure, the value of  is smaller than  but approaches  in the ideal-gas limit (Lewis 1900, p 54, 1901a1901b, p 48, and see appendices A–C in the digital supplement of part 1 of this series). The ratio / is known as thefugacity coefficient.

The ratio  is known as the water-vapour enhancement factorf (Tp). Thermodynamically-based equations for the enhancement factor in air were developed by Goff and Gratch (1945) for ASHVE13 and revised by Wexler and Hyland (1983), whose work for ASHRAE was most recently updated by Herrmann et al (2009) using the latest virial coefficients and the IAPWS equations for over water and ice (IAPWS 19922011, Wagner and Pruss 1993, Wagner et al 2011).

The expression for the enhancement factor is based on the equality at equilibrium of the chemical potential of water in the gas and condensed phases (and hence of the respective fugacities) and is a product of terms accounting for the Raoult, Poynting and (non-ideal) gas-phase molecular interaction effects (Hyland 1975) in the general form (Feistel et al 2015a2015b; and equation C.19 in appendix C of the digital supplement to part 1 of this series),

Equation (2)

This equation is equivalent to the complex formula given by Herrmann et al (2009) if the mole fraction of liquid water, xW, is expressed by Henry's law for dissolved air, the Poynting factor of liquid water, , is estimated by assuming a linear pressure dependence of specific volume, and a virial approximation of the fugacity coefficient (IAPWS 2015, Feistel et al 2015a2015b) is used.

Figure 1 shows how the partial pressure, xp (solid curve), would increase, were dry air to be added to a system at  K initially containing saturated vapour above a pool of water in a sealed box, for which the fugacities of the liquid water, , and the saturated water vapour, , are equal. The curves marked with 'Δ', '+' and 'squ' represent the results of multiplying the pure vapour pressure,  (dashed line) by the Raoult, Poynting and gas-phase interaction factors, respectively. Initially, the total pressure, p, in the container is due to the water vapour,  and the partial pressure . At this stage,  is slightly less than  because of interactions between vapour-phase water molecules. As dry air is added, the small amount of air dissolving causes a slight decrease in . At the same time, the increase in total pressure exerted on the liquid causes a substantial increase in . These phenomena, respectively, contribute a slight decrease and increase in partial pressure. The dominant contributor to the increase in partial pressure is the gas-phase interaction amongst water and air molecules, which acts to lower the fugacity of water in the vapour phase and thus to increase the net evaporation until .

Figure 1. This chart shows, for saturated humid air at 300 K, the theoretical water-vapour partial pressures as functions of pressure, p, that would arise were each of the Raoult, Poynting or interaction contributions to act alone in the enhancement of the full partial pressure (thick curve without marks) above the pure saturation vapour pressure (dashed line). The curves marked with 'Δ', '+' and 'squ' represent theoretical partial pressures obtained by multiplying the Raoult, Poynting and gas-phase interaction factors (extracted from the enhancement-factor equation given in Herrmann et al 2009) by the pure vapour pressure,  (dashed line). Also shown for comparison is the water-vapour fugacity ('●'), which was calculated using TEOS-10 functions (Wright et al 2010, Feistel et al 2010a). Note that for pure saturated vapour at 300 K ('blacksquare'),  and because of water-water gas-phase interaction. See text for details.

3.2. Formal definition by the WMO

In 1953, the newly formed WMO adopted the definition that had been proposed in the first of two resolutions issued earlier by the International Joint Committee on Psychrometric Data (IJCPD) as reported by List (1951), which in turn followed a dominant historic practice in the meteorological community of defining relative humidity as the ratio of vapour pressures. The WMO definition sets  in equation (1) which, with the condition that saturation is defined at the same pressure, i.e., , is equivalent to also setting , so that in this paper's notation,

Equation (3)

(WMO 2008, p 1.4–27). However, in the limit of pure water vapour the choice z = x does not provide a suitable measure of subsaturation, in contrast to . Note that to indicate saturation with respect to liquid water or hexagonal ice I, subscripts 'W' and 'Ih', respectively, will be used where relevant and omitted otherwise. Also, superscript 's' will be omitted for simplicity. The WMO has continued to recommend this definition through seven editions of 'The WMO Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation (CIMO Guide)' from 1954 to 200814(WMO 2008). The definition is also promoted by many other influential organizations15 and standards publications (ASHRAE 1994, NF X 15–110 1994, IMC 1996, BS 1339-1 2002, ASTM2014) and as the de facto standard is referred to here also as the standard definition. It is widely accepted, extremely useful and can be accurately calculated from other humidity quantities using reference equations for pure-water saturation vapour pressure, , and for the humid-air water-vapour enhancement factor, f (Tp).

The WMO definition does 'not apply to moist air when the pressure p is less than the saturation water-vapour pressure [] ... at temperature T' (WMO 2008, p 1.4–27). To illustrate, the range of possible states of humid air defined by the triple, (xTp), for  K is shown in figure 2. The thick solid curve represents the pressure at which the humid gas becomes saturated as a function of x. While from any point below the curve (e.g., A, B or C), saturation is possible, the WMO definition was only intended to cover that part above the horizontal dashed line, , of the range where, as in most meteorological conditions, saturation could be achieved at constant pressure (i.e., isobaric saturation ) represented by a horizontal arrow from A to the state (Tp) on the saturation curve.

Figure 2. The saturation-pressure curve, , and unsaturated states for humid air at 300 K at pressure p, as a function of x. The saturation curve is found from , and is represented by the thick solid line. Humid air can exist at 300 K at any state represented by a point below the saturation curve. The horizontal dashed line indicates the saturation vapour pressure for pure water at 300 K. Circles represent particular humid-air or vapour states and the arrows indicate potential paths to saturation including isobaric (from A and B) and isocompositional (from A, B and C). See text for details.

The second resolution issued by the IJCPD (List 1951) defined an extended form of equation (3) to the effect that when 'barometric pressure and temperature ... [conditions were] ... such that saturation was impossible, relative humidity is the ratio of the partial pressure of water vapour in the mixture or sample to the saturation pressure of pure water [] at the given temperature' (List 1951, Goff 1960). In the notation used here, the extension is

Equation (4)

and is indicated by the dashed arrow from B in figure 2. The resolution was issued subject to verification, but no further action was taken. Worrall (1965) proposed the same definition, emphasizing that here  is used 'as a reference only'. In his definitive work, Harrison (1965) published a definition for unsaturated pure vapour,

Equation (5)

which is a special case of ψext for which x = 1 so that  (vertical arrow from C), but omitted an extended-range definition. The issue was further addressed by Böse and Mitter (2004), who called  the 'virtual' saturation pressure, and by Lovell-Smith and Pearson (2006). In 2007, an extended-range definition was included in the German Standard VDI/VDE 3514 (2007), where saturation occurs at a 'hypothetical' system pressure equal to .

3.3. Relative fugacity and water activity

Lewis (1901a, p 55) wrote that the 'great utility of this new quantity [fugacity] ... [lies] in the fact that the approximate equations containing the vapor pressure and developed rigorously except for the assumption that the vapor pressure obeys the [ideal] gas law, may be replaced by exact equations of the same form or of equal simplicity containing the fugacity instead of the vapor pressure' (see also Gavroglu and Simões 2012). While the fugacity of water is equilibrated across phases at saturation, the relative fugacity of water, , (also known as the water activity, aW, see appendices B and C in the supplement of the part 1 companion paper) has been defined with reference to pure water under pressure p at the same temperature rather than to water containing some dissolved air when  (Lewis and Randall 1923, p 349, 1961, p 243). However, in practice difficulties in measurement of , and the close approximation of  to  over much of the range, have meant that the water activity aW has usually been approximated by the ratio of vapour pressures  measured directly (Robinson and Sinclair 1934, Scott 1958) or by determined using RH sensors (Schiraldi et al 2012).

4. Current definition and measurement practice

4.1. Current definitions

We can identify four major usages of RH definitions in contemporary publications.

(1)  

The WMO or standard definition, equation (3),

Equation (6)

is valid over most (but not all) of the range addressed by industry and by the meteorological, domestic and commercial air-conditioning communities. Over the valid range, the metrological community provides traceability to the SI for standard RH via calibration (see section 4.2).

(2)  

Full-range definition: In the absence of official sanction (apart from the comparatively recent standard VDI/VDE 3514 (2007)), those who need to calculate, measure or calibrate in the subsaturation pressure region have generally developed a pragmatic solution based on  rather than . Since when , the 'pragmatic' full-range definition is

Equation (7)

Nevertheless, with many major manufacturers of RH sensors extending the range well above 100 °C and as high as 180 °C, the need for widespread sanction of a definition covering the full range is clear. For example, this definition is recommended by a major manufacturer of humidity sensors and instruments16,17.

(3)  

Other non-standard definitions: Beside the predominant standard definition, several other RH definitions such as ψr and ψq continue to be used and to propagate on-line and in print. For example, the OMI (1951) definition ψr

Equation (8)

is occasionally mistakenly referred to as the WMO definition. The mistake possibly originated in a WMO training manual (Retallack 1973) and continues to propagate (Gill 1982, Rogers and Yau 1989, Pruppacher and Klett 1997, Katsaros 2001, Jacobson 2005, Dai 2006, Pierrehumbert 2010), including in some background articles of TEOS-10 (Feistel et al 2010a2010b) and online18. On the other hand, ASHRAE (1994) and BS 1339-1 (2002) identify the ratio of mixing ratios, , as the 'degree of saturation' and 'percentage saturation', respectively, thus clearly distinguishing it from the standard definition. Again, several papers define RH in terms of specific humidity as

Equation (9)

(e.g., Sundqvist 1978, Peixoto and Oort 1992, Katsaros 2001, Tompkins et al 2007, Lamquin et al 2009, Quaas 2012, Wells 2012). In the category of other non-standard definitions we note that IUPAC's online 'Goldbook' (IUPAC 2006) defines RH as

Equation (10)

which is problematic because it does not yield exactly 100 %rh at saturation of humid air.

(4)  

Water-vapour relative fugacity (see appendix C in the supplement of the part 1 companion paper):

(a)  

For unsaturated humid air specified by (xTp) in the presence of a bulk condensed phase, the thermodynamic driving force for net flux of water molecules is the difference between the (mass-based) chemical potentials  and μW(Tp) of water in the gas and condensed phases, respectively. This difference can be expressed in terms of the ratio of the fugacity,  (or equivalently the absolute activity, , see appendices B and C in the supplement of the part 1 companion paper), of water in the gas phase to that in the condensed phase, i.e., in terms of the relative fugacity, , or water activity, aW, of the unsaturated air,

Equation (11)

where  is the specific gas constant of water (see appendix D in the supplement of the part 1 companion paper). This ratio characterizes unsaturated humid air with reference to a theoretical bulk condensed phase, and also arises in thermodynamic derivations of the Kelvin equation for non-planar interfaces and of the vapour-pressure modifications associated with solutions (see also IOC et al 2010, Feistel 2012). This thermodynamic definition is widely referred to in food and solution chemistry, but its use in practice is limited, see entry (b) below. Consistent with TEOS-10, a virial equation for the calculation of the fugacity of water vapour in humid air has recently been published (IAPWS 2015, Feistel et al 2015a2015b). Note that the definition (11) is preliminary as it refers to pure liquid water as the condensed phase rather than to air-saturated water, i.e., the Raoult effect is neglected (see appendix C in the supplement of the part 1 companion paper for more details).

(b)  

For many physical chemists, climate modellers and chemical and food engineers, the water-vapour partial pressure is viewed as a convenient ideal-gas approximation to the fugacity, and the standard definition (3) is used as a convenient approximation to the relative fugacity, i.e.,

Equation (12)

(Loncin et al 1968, Hamer and Wu 1972, Kraus 1972, Greenspan 1977, Mathlouthi 2001, Blandamer et al2005, Choosri et al 2009, Björklund and Wadsö 2011, Feistel and Ebeling 2011, Li and Chylek 2012, Schiraldiet al 2012).

4.2. Measurement practice, use and calculation of relative humidity

Whilst there are many methods of measuring individual quantities from which the RH could be calculated when T and p are known, metrology-type applications favour chilled-mirror dew-point meters, since these offer the most reliability and precision over the greatest range, and because dew-point temperature Td is often the quantity realized at the primary standard level.

For most industrial applications and for ground-based meteorology, RH is measured using the electrical response of thin-film humidity sensors and, less frequently, using wet- and dry-bulb psychrometers and chilled-mirror hygrometers. Satellite and airborne remote-sensing applications tend to use electromagnetic absorption methods yielding a volumetric concentration. Good overviews of current and historical meteorological practice including calibration are given in WMO (2008) and Kämpfer (2013). Although all humidity sensors require calibration, those measuring RH require more frequent calibration because of processes associated with drift, ageing and contamination of the sensitive material.

Calibration implies comparison against a traceable reference and assumes appropriate propagation of the associated measurement uncertainty (VIM 2012). SI-traceability is disseminated through a chain of calibrations via a primary humidity standard. Currently, the primary humidity generator19 (HG) is the most common ultimate source of traceability in humidity measurements, and a typical traceability chain for RH is presented in figure 3. In most such generators, a continuously flowing gas is brought to saturation at a known temperature, T1, and pressure, p1. In so-called two-pressure and two-temperature humidity generators, the saturated gas passes through an expansion valve and/or heater to flow as an unsaturated humid gas without changing its vapour mole fraction, x, provided no condensation takes place. This now unsaturated mole fraction, x, can be calculated as

Equation (13)

Figure 3. Typical traceability chains for RH based on a primary humidity generator (HG) conditioning air to a known water-vapour mole fraction x which is calculated as a function of the saturation temperature and pressure (T1 and p1, respectively, see equation (13)) and the humidity reference functions for the vapour pressure  and enhancement factor f (Tp). The quantity x can be used to calibrate a cavity-ring-down spectrometer (CRDS), for example. A further pressure and temperature measurement allows Td(xp2) using equation (16) and ψ(xp2, T2) using equations (3) and (14) to be calculated for calibration of chilled-mirror hygrometers (CMH) and RH hygrometers as secondary standards, respectively. When using a generator as a non-traceable stable source, the secondary standards can be used to measure xTd or ψ of conditioned air for calibration of a 'device under calibration' (DUC), including, as illustrated, a RH hygrometer.

Here,  and  represent reference functions that allow the calculation at T1 of the saturation water-vapour pressure  and at T1 and p1 of the water-vapour enhancement factor, f , respectively, and a and b are vectors of fitted parameters for the respective reference functions (see Lovell-Smith 20092012). In other generators, the input gas may be humidified directly to a non-saturated level—using partial saturation, diffusion or blending approaches—that is, definitively characterized in terms of mass, volume or amount of component substances, and that enables the mole fraction to be calculated (Hasegawa and Little 1977, Stevens and Bell 1992, Heinonen 2002, Lovell-Smith 2009, Mackrodt 2012, Meyer et al 2012).

Once the mole fraction, x, is known, by whatever method, the measurement of other parameters at the device under calibration (DUC) such as the gas temperature, T2, and pressure, p2, enables calculation of other unknown quantities such as dew-point temperature, RH or others. The standard RH at the DUC is, from equations (3) and (13),

Equation (14)

in general, and for the two-pressure humidity generator,

Equation (15)

Where RH traceability is required using a generator as a stable source, the reference hygrometer is usually a chilled-mirror hygrometer calibrated for dew-point temperature, Td, which is found by solving

Equation (16)

in general, and for the two-pressure humidity generator, by solving

Equation (17)

The output from a saturator may be fed directly to a hygrometer with minimal reduction in pressure, such that  and  This is the principle of the single-pressure humidity generator. In practice, for greater accuracy, the pressure difference  is measured and a correction  added (Lovell-Smith 2009).

Note the necessity to calculate  and f (Tp) in equations (14) and (16) above, and in most calculations. The most up-to-date versions of  reference equations are reported by IAPWS (19922011), and the most up-to-date version of the f (Tp) reference function is given in Herrmann et al (2009). However, a wide variety of reference functions continue to be used. For example, the WMO CIMO Guide (WMO 2008) recommends the so-called Magnus equations (IMC 1996) for calculating  above ice and water for meteorological conditions, and a simple equation to calculate f (Tp) as a function of p only when the pressure is around 100 kPa. For values of f (Tp) over a wider pressure and temperature range, WMO recommends International Meteorological Tables of 1966 (WMO 1966), which were calculated using the original Goff and Gratch equations (Goff 1949).

Under the axiomatic framework of TEOS-10, the calculation of the standard RH requires solving for x and , respectively, the implicit equations

Equation (18)

which replace equations (13) and (14). Similarly, calculation of the dew-point temperature, Td, requires the equations

Equation (19)

to be solved for x and Td, respectively. Equations (18) and (19) may equivalently be expressed in terms of fugacities substituting the corresponding chemical potentials, see equation (C.1) in the digital supplement of part 1 of this series. Note that including the dissolution of air in liquid water will require a future extension of TEOS-10.

4.3. Meteorological uncertainty requirements

The spatiotemporal patterns of atmospheric water-vapour fields result from the superposition of contributions from microscopic to macroscopic length and time scales. The length, period and amplitude of the smallest scales that need to be resolved depend on the question of interest and may strongly differ between uses in

(i)  

applied meteorology (e.g., agriculture and forest meteorology, hydrology, environmental and technical meteorology),

(ii)  

numerical meteorology (e.g., numerical weather prediction, general circulation and climate modelling) and

(iii)  

monitoring tasks (e.g., regional and global climate monitoring).

Atmospheric water-vapour observation is based on both in situ and remote-sensing measurement techniques with different measurement uncertainties, collocation and representativeness errors (Peixoto and Oort 1996, Randel et al 1996, Miloshevich et al 2006, Kämpfer 2013). For applications in synoptic, aeronautical, agricultural and marine meteorology, hydrology and climatology, the WMO CIMO Guide recommends target uncertainties20 for surface humidity of 1 %rh and 5 %rh at high-range and mid-range RH, respectively, with a reporting resolution of 1 %rh (WMO 2008, table 4.1, p I.4-2 and annex 1.B), whilst recognizing that these can be difficult to achieve in practice. The monitoring of the current increase in stratospheric water21 by approximately 0.5 μmol mol−1 per decade (Kley et al 2000, Rosenlof et al2001, Leiterer et al 2005), as well as the quantification of the water-vapour transport from the troposphere to the stratosphere (Hintsa et al 1999), requires very high accuracies of humidity measurements in the upper troposphere/lower stratosphere and at the hygropause (Kley et al1979). The latter is characterized by joint occurrences of low temperatures down to 190 K and low water-vapour mole ratios22 (see section 2) down to (2 ± 1) μmol mol−1 at an altitude of 17 km in the tropics (Teitelbaum et al 2000). Best-performing state-of-the-art radiosondes with application of sophisticated correction schemes were demonstrated to achieve a mean relative uncertainty, u(ψ)/ψ, of about 1% in the lower and middle troposphere (where RH >10 %rh) and of about 2% in the upper troposphere under mostly night-time conditions (Miloshevich et al2006, table 3 therein). By application of the method of standardized frequencies to a research radiosonde, Nagel et al (2001) and Leiterer et al (2005) exceptionally reported an achievable repeatability of 0.01 %rh and a standard uncertainty of 1 %rh for RH determination in the temperature region down to −70 °C. This accuracy is comparable with the accuracy of the traditional aspiration method of meteorology and close to the uncertainty requirement of better than 1 %rh for climatological research (Leiterer et al 2005). However, in view of the multitude of different radiosonde types and correction schemes in use, the required accuracy for climate research is still very difficult to realize in the operational radiosounding service (Miloshevich et al2001, Antikainen et al 2002, Ovarlez et al 2002, Tompkins et al 2007). Forward simulation of atmospheric dynamics from an initial state, such as boundary-layer turbulence-forced moist convection, also poses very high requirements on the observation (and initialization) of humidity fields (Crook 1996). The very high sensitivity of predicted convective rainwater to the initial specific humidity at the surface suggests a required uncertainty below 1 %rh for surface RH in order to fulfil hydrological demands with respect to flood prediction in the course of severe weather events.

Given that RH is a non-linear function of temperature, pressure and vapour mole fraction, the current fixed meteorological uncertainty requirement of 1 %rh for RH measurements is already demanding at both high relative humidities and low temperatures, yet might still be too large a tolerance with respect to uncertainty propagation in the derivation of climatological long-term statistics including higher-order statistical moments and cross correlations. The consideration of uncertainties in the analysis of meteorological time series is beginning (Willett et al 2013), but is not yet common practice as can be seen from the comparatively small number of dedicated studies on uncertainty analysis. Continued dialog and collaboration between the meteorological and metrological communities will enable the best use of resources to maintain and improve (i) strict and unified metrological requirements for RH in the operational observation service and for data processing (inclusive protocol standards), and (ii) SI-traceability of humidity measurements.

5. Problems and deficiencies

For a number of reasons, the definition of RH requires attention. A good definition should have a firm thermodynamic foundation, it should be unambiguous, complete and internally consistent, and tailored subset definitions should be derivable to meet more limited applications. While meeting these requirements, it must also be possible to relate any definition to achievable practical realizations, so that the definition can be connected with disseminated traceable measurements.

(1)  

The de facto standard definition of RH is incomplete and other non-standard definitions competeWhile the standard definition, ψx, given by equation (6), has widespread official sanction and use, it is defined over only part of the full range over which other humidity quantities are defined, where the concept of RH is meaningful and useful, and where RH sensors respond sensibly. The definition is restricted to humid-air states where  and isobaric saturation is possible.Two non-standard definitions, ψr, given by equation (8), and ψq, given by equation (9), share the limited range of the standard definition and continue to appear in the literature. A third non-standard definition, equation (10), sanctioned by IUPAC, defines the saturated state with reference to pure water, but is inconsistent since it yields RH of 100 %rh before saturation is reached. Differences between the standard and non-standard definitions including also the relative fugacity, equation (11), are shown in figure 4. Most traceable RH calibrations will be based on the standard definition ψx, and the incorrect assumption by some users that the hygrometer instead reports ψrψq or ψIUPAC (or has been calibrated with respect to these) could lead to significant error.The differences between different RH measures are often significant, and to prevent invisible propagation of non-standard definitions, the definition used should always be documented to allow conversion to ψx as in

Equation (20)

Here, ω is the ratio of the molar masses of water and dry air, and  is the fugacity coefficient of water in the gas phase (see appendices C and D in the supplement of the part 1 companion paper).

(2)  

The 'full-range' definition lacks official sanction and theoretical justificationThe full-range definitionψfull, equation (7), has been a common-sense but informal choice by those needing to measure outside the standard range. Although proposed by the IJCPD in 1950, until the publication of the German Standard VDI/VDE 3514 (2007), the full definition had no official sanction, and to date no other authorities have provided recognition. Note that to achieve saturation, in figure 2 any number of paths could be chosen from an unsaturated state such as B to the saturation curve. The definition of a 'theoretical' saturation state such that  =  provides continuity and consistency with the standard definition, yet theoretical justification is lacking. Nor is it clear in what sense the saturation state for the pure-vapour definition is 'theoretical'.

(3)  

The reference saturation phase is not fully specifiedThe key to a definition of the relative humidity of unsaturated humid air (or water vapour) at T and p is the specification of the nature of the reference condensed phase. Under the standard definition, the reference phase is fully specified over the limited range , through the isobaric condition defining the total pressure (), and through the water-vapour enhancement-factor reference function that implicitly defines the associated dissolution of air in the condensed phase. For a full definition, the saturation phase cannot be so defined. From a typical unsaturated state in the extended range, (e.g., state B in figure 2), saturation is not possible unless  and here the isobaric condition must be replaced by another constraint such as on (e.g., ) or  (e.g.,  = ) in order to specify a unique condensed-phase state.

(4)  

Standard approaches are lacking for gas compositions different from standard airThe water-vapor enhancement factor for humid air (e.g., Herrmann et al 2009) is specified for air of a standard composition. However, the composition of air is neither uniform nor invariable. Under meteorological conditions, such non-uniformity and variability is practically irrelevant, but for industrial applications (such as for flue gases, carbon sequestration or fuel cells) the conditions and composition may be sufficiently different as to require a new or modified enhancement-factor reference function (or at least allowance for differing composition in the uncertainty budget). For example, the enhancement factor of H2O in CO2 differs greatly from that in air (Meyer and Harvey2015). From equation (2), the requirements for modification of the enhancement factor to allow for variation in composition are evident. While the Poynting factor and the fugacity coefficient for pure saturated water vapour are independent of dry-gas species, the fugacity coefficient describing non-ideality due to interactions in the gas-phase mixture will strongly depend on gas composition. The equilibrium mole fraction of liquid water will also change due to different solubility of the gas compared to standard air, but for sparingly soluble gases at pressures near atmospheric this difference will be negligible. For high concentrations of dissolved gases, the ideal-solution approximation used in equation (2) may also require correction.

(5)  

Most RH definitions do not directly represent thermodynamic driving forcesThe main relative-humidity definitions reported here, i.e., equations (6)–(11), can be calculated and realized with equal traceability to the SI. But none of the quantities rsat, qsat and  has a related quantity in the condensed phase to which it may become equilibrated. Rather, these quantities represent gas-phase properties at the outcome of a saturation process. The saturated state itself occurs at equilibrium when the chemical potentials of species existing in two or more phases are equilibrated, and the fugacity of water can be used to quantify the saturated state. Significantly, the driving force towards the saturated state of any particular unsaturated humid-air or pure-vapour state is the difference in chemical potential of water in each phase, and this difference can be expressed equivalently as the relative fugacity of water, which seems, therefore, to provide a suitable thermodynamic basis for the definition of RH.

(6)  

There is no internationally agreed unit symbol for RH, nor an agreed method for scaling of the dimensionless unitBy its definition, equation (1), RH is a non-negative quantity of dimension one (commonly referred to as 'dimensionless') with values ranging from 0 for dry gas to 1 for saturated gas and higher for supersaturated states common in upper-air meteorology (Peter et al 2006) or in transient states of technical processes. According to the SI (BIPM 2006), the expressions ψ = 0.5 and ψ= 50% are equivalent. The SI suggests that dimensionless numbers should be specified in terms of the entities, so that the vapour mole fraction x = 2.5 × 10−3 may also be written as x = 2.5 mmol mol−1. For example, for specific humidity the correct wording is 'water in air at a mass fraction of 0.05' or 'water in air at a mass fraction of 50 g kg−1'. However, widespread preferred usage is to express relative humidity as a percentage, usually with an associated text qualifier giving for example '%rh' rather than %. The qualifier allows a clear distinction to be made between RH 'percentage units' and intervals expressed as 'percent of value', in particular when different values of RH are compared or uncertainties reported. The unit symbol %rh is in some cases standardized nationally (BS 1339-1 2002) but not universally, and some language variations exist. Although the SI Brochure stipulates that 'Phrases such as 'percentage by mass', 'percentage by volume', or 'percentage by amount of substance' should not be used', the use of the symbol %rh is consistent with the recommendation that 'extra information on the quantity should instead be conveyed in the description of the measurand and the name and symbol for the unit' (BIPM 2006, p 134).As a rule, the form (1) of the various RH definitions ensures that at saturation, ψ = 100 %rh, however, where a different form is used, such as for relative fugacity, saturation should occur at 100 %rh. This should be spelled out, since at least one relatively authoritative definition,  is a ratio of two different humidity quantities: vapour partial pressure and pure-water saturation vapour pressure. This definition does apply over the extended range; however, within the standard range, where  and  hold, equation (10) will always give  at saturation (e.g., see figure 4).

(7)  

Reference-equation uncertainty is incompletely specifiedCurrently, in meteorological articles and manuals, equations and data used for the evaluation of the RH are often not accompanied by reasonable uncertainty estimates. Similarly, approximations such as using  for  are sometimes given, but uncertainty associated with the approximation is not. While conventional uncertainty propagation rules sum over all positive contributions, a procedure that ignores uncertainty covariances may produce estimated uncertainties that are much too large for the case of equation (16). To account for this effect, covariance coefficients need to be included appropriately (Lovell-Smith20062012, BIPM et al 2008, Feistel 2011b).

Figure 4. Differences between the standard definition ψx and four non-standard definitions at 40 °C (hollow symbols) and 80 °C (filled symbols) for pressures p = 0.1 MPa (a) and p = 1 MPa (b). Three non-standard definitions are of the form ψz, where the humidity quantityz is the mixing ratio, r (squares), the specific humidity, q (triangles), and the fugacity, (diamonds). The fourth non-standard definition is ψIUPAC (circles). For each value ofψx(Tp), x and  are calculated and substituted into equation (20), which is rearranged to give each of the differences, ψx − ψz.

6. Suggested tasks

A number of problems and deficiencies in or associated with the definition of RH have been raised. We recommend that the BIPM in cooperation with IAPWS, and with other international organizations and institutions, develop and support state-of-the-art solutions for what are long-standing metrological issues, and in this section outline potential tasks. The immediate task seems to be to provide a framework within which existing definitions fit (or are excluded) and from there to explore the thermodynamic basis and the potential usefulness of the different definitions, and hence also to provide means to calculate and compare the definitions.

6.1. Framework

The framework can be straightforward. For example, the standard definition, where p andx < 1, and the pure-vapour definition, where p =  and x = 1, are each a special case of the full-range definition. Saturation is attained isobarically and isocompositionally, respectively. The full-range definition with its 'hypothetical' saturation can be viewed as an approximation to a relative-fugacity definition in the same way that the ITS-90 temperature scale acts as a useful, consistent and SI-traceable approximation to the thermodynamic temperature.

The relative-fugacity definition can, at least initially, take on the same extended range and justification as the full-range RH definition, as the starting point to explore the underlying theoretical basis. The relative-fugacity definition will need some qualifier to distinguish it from the more general term of relative humidity. The status of water activity and (relative) activity within the framework will need to be determined.

The ratios r/rsat and q/qsat as RH definitions will be deprecated but will retain their other assigned names of the 'degree of saturation' and the 'relative specific humidity', respectively.

6.2. Thermodynamic basis

In order to develop relative fugacity as the thermodynamic basis for a relative-humidity definition, a firm thermodynamic basis for defining the reference state must be provided. This task requires understanding and developing the thermodynamic basis of saturation and of non-saturated equilibrium such as is found between humidity sensors and the adjacent humid air, between humid air and aqueous solutions or mixtures, and between industrial surfaces and conditioning gases. For example, it will be useful to derive the Kelvin equation for curved interfaces (and extensions for electric field, aqueous solutions, etc) in terms of fugacity and relative fugacity without resorting to the ideal-gas limit.

Such investigation should also explore the nature of the equilibrium when the pressure is too low to support a bulk condensed phase, i.e., under conditions where the extended-range part of the relative-fugacity definition applies. To what extent does the clear thermodynamic basis of relative fugacity over the standard range support a single unified definition over the full range?

6.3. Means to calculate

The relationship between the fugacity and partial pressure of water vapour in humid air was sketched in section 3. TEOS-10 and the work of Feistel et al (2015a2015b) provide new means to calculate the fugacity and relative fugacity of water in humid air. Additional corrections for dissolved air in liquid water are required. Further work is needed to enable propagation of uncertainty from the large amount of data input to the Helmholtz and Gibbs energy equations forming the basis of TEOS-10 into those equations through to the many calculable quantities including the fugacity. Again, stand-alone virial equations for the fugacity (Feistel et al 2015a,2015b) and for the enhancement factor (Herrmann et al 2009) should also have associated uncertainty presented in a way that allows correct accounting for covariances.

On the basis of the framework, thermodynamic basis and the means to calculate, further main tasks can be identified:

Technical developments:

(a)  

Investigate the need to account for departure from standard air composition, including isotopic and chemical variation and chemical reactions associated with the gas and condensed phases.

(b)  

Develop reference equations (such as for the virial expression for fugacity, the enhancement factor and vapour-pressure reference functions, and for larger systems such as TEOS-10) with uncertainty expressed in the form of fitted parameter covariance.

(c)  

Consider other humid gases besides standard air for which real-gas properties are available to derive corresponding fugacity equations.Conceptual framework:

(d)  

Develop an 'axiomatic' approach to humidity. TEOS-10 has demonstrated the possibility and value of a rigorous axiomatic foundation of the description of seawater–ice–air thermodynamic properties. Using the same approach, development of a consistent axiomatic definition and nomenclature of humidity quantities as derived from a small set of empirical fundamental equations will help provide clarity and consistency within the wider humidity community. One such axiomatic approach to humidity, which uses an enhanced subset of TEOS-10, is outlined in appendix D of the digital supplement to part 1 of this series. The enhanced subset of TEOS-10-based functions will also include tailored standalone functions (such as for saturation vapour pressure, the enhancement factor and fugacity, Feistel et al 2015a2015b) where less computational complexity is desired, while maintaining consistency with TEOS-10 within a specified tolerance.

(e)  

Develop a mise en pratique (BIPM 2006) for RH to provide guidance for practitioners to realize RH according to its definition, as well as guidance for calculating the quantities and their associated uncertainties. The mise en pratique will be informed by the definition hierarchy, and will link to similar mises en pratique for other humidity quantities and also to TEOS-10 as outlined in (d).

(f)  

Develop standardized nomenclature and units. This activity would be integrated with (e). Note that the definition of a physical quantity is independent of the particular unit in which the measured values may be expressed.International harmonisation:

(g)  

Encourage official sanction of the framework and associated thermodynamic basis. Encourage the reporting of applied RH definition in calibration reports and in journal articles.

(h)  

Identify non-standard definitions and publicize alternative names. Identify incorrect attribution to WMO or other sources. Provide documentation of terms and definitions on websites such as WMO (where it already exists) and IAPWS, AMS23, IUPAC, etc, and also Wikipedia.

(i)  

Continue to dialogue with organizations representative of users of the alternative definitions of RH, to increase the level of harmonization, where possible.

7. Conclusion

A thermodynamically founded definition of relative humidity could be formulated in terms of water-vapour fugacity. Other definitions currently in widespread use, such as the relative partial pressure, can be understood as practical proxies to the fugacity definition, consistent within the uncertainty of routine measurements in industry or meteorology. As a preferred SI-traceable surrogate measurand, dew-point temperature is adopted for its realizability and low measurement uncertainty. Calculation of relative fugacity from dew-point temperature, and conversion between alternative RH definitions, is possible using TEOS-10 equations, with an extension to dissolved air to be specified in the future. Consistently covering also the low-pressure range where saturated humid air does not exist seems possible, but will require future studies. Unambiguous nomenclature may be developed and recommended by the international committees governing the SI. In order to ensure their most widespread acceptance and use, it is important that the solutions for these long-standing metrological issues be addressed by a wide range of international organizations and institutions beginning with the BIPM in cooperation with IAPWS.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Michael Kühne, who as the Director of the BIPM organized the meetings with IAPWS representatives at the BIPM in August 2011 and February 2012 and inspired the writing of this review article. Valuable suggestions were provided by our colleagues Richard Davis, Don Gatley, Sebastian Herrmann, Joachim Pelkowski, Rod White and Christoph Zülicke. The authors also thank the journal editor and the anonymous referees for encouraging comments and constructive suggestions. Organizations financially supporting this work include the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR), with funding from national SCOR committees, and the International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam (IAPWS), with funding from IAPWS National Committees. Part of this work was funded by the New Zealand Government as part of a contract for the provision of national measurement standards. The contribution of NPL was funded by the UK National Measurement System Programme for Engineering and Flow Metrology, and by the EMRP Joint Research Project ENV 58 MeteoMet2. The EMRP is jointly funded by the EMRP participating countries within EURAMET and the European Union. Partial contribution of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is not subject to copyright in the US. This paper contributes to the tasks of the Joint SCOR/IAPWS/IAPSO Committee on the Properties of Seawater (JCS). The contribution of one of the authors is covered by © Crown copyright 2015. Reproduced by permission of the controller of HMSO and the Queen's printer for Scotland.

Footnotes

  • Although this section primarily concerns humid air and water vapour, much of the discussion can be generalized to apply to any humid gas or to different samples of humid air of varied composition.

  • WMO: World Meteorological Organization, www.wmo.int

  • 10 

    OMI: Organisation Météorologique Internationale, IMO: International Meteorological Organisation (1873–1951), a forerunner of WMO (founded in 1950).

  • 11 

    Donald P Gatley, personal communication (2012).

  • 12 

    Wikipedia: Meteorologisches Observatorium Hohenpeißenberg.http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteorologisches_Observatorium_Hohenpeißenberg, retrieved 18 January 2015.

  • 13 

    ASHVE: American Society of Heating and Ventilation Engineers, a forerunner of ASHRAE.

  • 14 

    Although the 1953 definition included a note that relative humidity at temperatures less than 0 °C is to be evaluated with respect to liquid water, it now allows evaluation with respect to ice and requires appropriate identification to avoid ambiguity.

  • 15 

    For example, ASHRAE: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineers; AFNOR: Association Française de Normalisation; IMC: Institute of Measurement and Control; VDI/VDE: Verein Deutscher Ingenieure/Verband der Elektrotechnik, Elektronik und Informationstechnik; BSI: British Standards Institute; ASTM: American Society for Testing and Materials.

  • 16 

  • 17 

    Certain commercial products are identified in this paper, but only in order to foster understanding. Such identification neither constitutes nor implies recommendation or endorsement by any of the organizations represented by the authors.

  • 18 

    For example, the on-line 'Glossary of Meteorology' of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) incorrectly states that relative humidity 'is alternatively defined by the World Meteorological Organization as the ratio of the mixing ratio to the saturation mixing ratio' (http://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Relative_humidity retrieved 17 April 2015).

  • 19 

    Occasionally gravimetric hygrometers are used as additional confirmation of generator performance; however, it is rare for this to be the main route of traceability to the SI.

  • 20 

    This uncertainty is equal to the width of the interval in which the true value lies with a probability level of 95%, corresponding to the 2σ level for a Gaussian distribution of the variable (WMO 2008, Annex 1.B).

  • 21 

    Water vapour significantly contributes to the total hydrogen budget of the stratosphere (Dessler et al 1994, Hurst et al 1999) and plays an important role in stratospheric chemistry such as in formation of polar stratospheric clouds, the ozone hole and photochemically reactive radicals (Farman et al 1985, Solomon 1988, Spivakovsky et al 2000, Brasseur and Solomon 2005). It may also serve as a tracer to study atmospheric circulation and the hydrological budget (Brewer1949, Dobson 1956, Johnston and Solomon 1979, Newell and Gould-Stewart 1981, Danielsen1982, Hintsa et al 1994, Webster et al 1994, Crook 1996, Mote et al 1996, Dethof et al 1999, Romps and Kuang 2010).

  • 22 

    In order to be consistent with WMO (2008) and other authorities, for the quantity nv/na (see section 1) we use the term mole ratio rather than mixing ratio, which is the term used by Teitelbaum et al (2000).

  • 23 

    AMS: American Meteorological Society, www.ametsoc.org/

References

  • Abbot C G and Fowle F E Jr 1908 Income and outgo of heat from the Earth, and the dependence of its temperature thereon Ann. Astrophys. Obs. 2 (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution) 159–76

  • Albrecht F 1940 Untersuchungen über den Wärmehaushalt der Erdoberfläche in verschiedenen Klimagebieten (Berlin: Julius Springer)

    CrossRef

  • Allen M R and Ingram W J 2002 Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycleNature 419 224–32

    CrossRef

  • Antikainen V, Paukkunen A and Jauhiainen H 2002 Measurement accuracy and repeatability of Vaisala RS90 radiosonde Vaisala News 159 11–13

  • Arderon W 1746 Extract of a letter from Mr William Arderon F.R.S. to Mr Henry Baker, F.R.S. with the description of an improved hygroscope Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 44 95–6

    CrossRef

  • ASHRAE 1994 Standard 41.6–1994 Method for Measurement of Moist Air Properties.

  • ASTM 2014 D1356-14: Standard Terminology Relating to Sampling and Analysis of Atmospheres(West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International)

  • Baumgartner A and Reichel E 1975 The World Water Balance (München: R Oldenbourg Verlag)

  • BIPM 2006 The International System of Units (SI), Organisation Intergouvernementale de la Convention du Mètre 8th edn (Sevres: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures)www.bipm.org/en/si/si_brochure/

  • BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML 2008 Evaluation of Measurement Data—Supplement 1 to the ‘Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement’—Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology JCGM 101www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_101_2008_E.pdf

  • Bintanja R and Selten F M 2014 Future increases in Arctic precipitation linked to local evaporation and sea-ice retreat Nature 509 479–82

    CrossRef

  • Björklund S and Wadsö L 2011 A calorimetric method to determine water activity Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82 114903

    CrossRef

  • Blandamer M J, Engberts J B F N, Gleeson P T and Reis J C R 2005 Activity of water in aqueous systems; a frequently neglected property Chem. Soc. Rev. 34 440–58

    CrossRef

  • Böse N and Mitter H 2004 Calculation and measurement of humidity at temperatures higher than 100 °C Proc. TEMPMEKO 2004 (Croatia: Cavtat-Dubrovnik) pp 689–93

  • Bony S et al 2015 Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity Nature Geosci. 8 261–8

    CrossRef

  • Brasseur G P and Solomon S 2005 Aeronomy of the Middle Atmosphere: Chemistry and Physics of the Stratosphere and Mesosphere (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer)

  • Brewer A W 1949 Evidence for a world circulation provided by the measurements of helium and water vapour distribution in the stratosphere Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 75 351–63

    CrossRef

  • Brewster P (ed) 1832 Hygrometry. The American Edition of the New Edinburgh Encyclopaedia(Philadelphia, PA: Joseph and Edward Parker)

  • BS 1339-1 2002 Humidity Terms, Definitions and Formulae ISBN: 0 580 38475 6

  • Chahine M T 1992 The hydrological cycle and its influence on climate Nature 359 373–80

    CrossRef

  • Chen X and Tung K-K 2014 Varying planetary heat sink led to global-warming slowdown and acceleration Science 345 897–903

    CrossRef

  • Choosri T, Koglbauer G and Wendland M 2009 A new method for the measurement of the water activity or relative humidity by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy J. Chem. Eng. Data 541179–82

    CrossRef

  • Clement A and DiNezio P 2014 The tropical Pacific Ocean—back in the driver’s seat? Science 343976–8

    CrossRef

  • Coates A G (ed) 1997 Central America. A Natural and Cultural History (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press)

  • Coumou D, Lehmann J and Beckmann J 2015 The weakening summer circulation in the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes Science 348 324–7

    CrossRef

  • Cowtan K and Way R G 2014 Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series and its impact on recent temperature trends Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 140 1935–44

    CrossRef

  • Crook N A 1996 Sensitivity of moist convection forced by boundary layer processes to low-level thermodynamic fields Mon. Weather Rev. 124 1767–85

    CrossRef

  • Curry J 2014 Climate science: uncertain temperature trend Nat. Geosci. 7 83–4

    CrossRef

  • Dai A 2006 Recent climatology, variability, and trends in global surface humidity J. Clim. 193589–605

    CrossRef

  • Dai A, Karl T R, Sun B and Trenberth K E 2006 Recent trends in cloudiness over the United States: a tale of monitoring inadequacies Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 87 597–606

    CrossRef

  • Danielsen E F 1982 A dehydration mechanism for the stratosphere Geophys. Res. Lett. 9 605–8

    CrossRef

  • de Groot S R and Mazur P 1962 Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics (Amsterdam/New York: North Holland/Dover)

  • de Luc J A 1792 On evaporation Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 82 400–24

    CrossRef

  • Dessler A E 2010 A determination of the cloud feedback from climate variations over the past decade Science 330 1523–7

    CrossRef

  • Dessler A E, Weinstock E M, Hintsa E J, Anderson J G, Webster C R, May R D, Elkins J W and Dutton G S 1994 An examination of the total hydrogen budget of the lower stratosphere Geophys. Res. Lett. 21 2563–6

    CrossRef

  • Dessler A E, Zhang Z and Yang P 2008 Water-vapor climate feedback inferred from climate fluctuations, 2003–2008 Geophys. Res. Lett. 35 L20704

    CrossRef

  • Dethof A, O’Neill A, Slingo J M and Smit H G J 1999 A mechanism for moistening the lower stratosphere involving the Asian summer monsoon Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125 1079–106

    CrossRef

  • Dickson J, Camões M F, Spitzer P, Fisicaro P, Stoica D, Pawlowicz R and Feistel R 2016 Metrological challenges for measurements of key climatological observables. Part 3: seawater pHMetrologia 53 R26–R39

    IOPscience

  • Dobson G M B 1956 Origin and distribution of polyatomic molecules in the atmosphere Proc. R. Soc. A 236 187–93

    CrossRef

  • Durack P J and Wijffels S E 2010 Fifty-year trends in global ocean salinities and their relationship to broad-scale warming J. Clim. 23 4342–62

    CrossRef

  • Durack P J, Wijffels S E and Boyer T P 2013 Long-term salinity changes and implications for the global water cycle Ocean Circulation and Climate. A 21st Century Perspective ed G Siedler et al(Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp 727–57

    CrossRef

  • Durack P J, Wijffels S E and Matear R J 2012 Ocean salinities reveal strong global water cycle intensification during 1950 to 2000 Science 336 455–8

    CrossRef

  • Ellis W 1878 Note on the mean relative humidity at the royal observatory, Greenwich Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 4 194–98

    CrossRef

  • Emden R 1913 Über Strahlungsgleichgewicht und atmosphärische Strahlung. Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der oberen Inversion. Sitzungsberichte der mathematisch-physikalischen Klasse der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München pp 55–142 Jahrgang 1913

  • Emery W J, Talley L D and Pickard G L 2006 Descriptive Physical Oceanography (Amsterdam: Elsevier)

  • Erikson T A 1965 Forced vaporization of water Humidity and Moisture, Vol. III, Fundamentals and Standards ed A Wexler and W A Wildhack (New York: Reinhold Publishing) pp 351–54

  • Everett C, Blasi D E and Roberts S G 2015 Climate, vocal folds, and tonal languages: Connecting the physiological and geographic dots Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 1322–7

    CrossRef

  • Falkenhagen H, Ebeling W and Hertz H G 1971 Theorie der Elektrolyte (Leipzig: S. Hirzel Verlag)

  • Farman J C, Gardiner B G and Shanklin J D 1985 Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction Nature 315 207–10

    CrossRef

  • Fasullo J T and Trenberth K E 2012 A less cloudy future: the role of subtropical subsidence in climate sensitivity Science 338 792–4

    CrossRef

  • Feistel R 2011a Radiative entropy balance and vertical stability of a gray atmosphere Eur. Phys. J.B 82 197–206

    CrossRef

  • Feistel R 2011b Stochastic ensembles of thermodynamic potentials Accreditation Qual. Assur. 16225–35

    CrossRef

  • Feistel R 2012 TEOS-10: a new international oceanographic standard for seawater, ice, fluid water, and humid air Int. J. Thermophys. 33 1335–51

    CrossRef

  • Feistel R 2013 Water, steam and climate Proc. 16th Int. Conf. on the Properties of Water and Steam (Greenwich, UK, 1–5 September 2013) doi:10.13140/2.1.3855.9043

  • Feistel R and Ebeling W 2011 Physics of Self-Organization and Evolution (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH)

    CrossRef

  • Feistel R, Lovell-Smith J W and Hellmuth O 2015a Virial approximation of the TEOS-10 equation for the fugacity of water in humid air Int. J. Thermophys. 36 44–68

    CrossRef

  • Feistel R, Lovell-Smith J W and Hellmuth O 2015b Virial approximation of the TEOS-10 equation for the fugacity of water in humid air Int. J. Thermophys. 36 204 (erratum)

    CrossRef

  • Feistel R et al 2016 Metrological challenges for measurements of key climatological observables: oceanic salinity and pH, and atmospheric humidity. Part 1: overview Metrologia 53 R1–R11

    CrossRef

  • Feistel R, Wright D G, Jackett D R, Miyagawa K, Reissmann J H, Wagner W, Overhoff U, Guder C, Feistel A and Marion G M 2010a Numerical implementation and oceanographic application of the thermodynamic potentials of liquid water, water vapour, ice, seawater and humid air—part 1: background and equations Ocean Sci. 6 633–77

    CrossRef

  • Feistel R, Wright D G, Kretzschmar H-J, Hagen E, Herrmann S and Span R 2010b Thermodynamic properties of sea air Ocean Sci. 6 91–141

    CrossRef

  • Forbes J and Mahlmann W 1836 Abriss einer Geschichte der neueren Fortschritte und des gegenwärtigen Zustandes der Meteorologie (Berlin: C.G. Lüderitz)

  • Gatley D P 2013 Understanding Psychrometrics 3rd edn (Atlanta, GA: The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.)

  • Gavroglu K and Simões A 2012 From physical chemistry to quantum chemistry: how chemists dealt with mathematics HYLE—Int. J. Phil. Chem. 18 45–69 (www.hyle.org/journal/issues/18-1/gavroglu-simoes.pdf)

  • Gilbert L W 1803 Einige Bemerkungen zu Dalton’s Untersuchungen über die Verdünstung Ann. Phys. 15 144–68

    CrossRef

  • Gill A E 1982 Atmosphere Ocean Dynamics (San Diego, CA: Academic)

  • Gimeno L 2013 Grand challenges in atmospheric science Front. Earth Sci. 1 1–5

    CrossRef

  • Glansdorff P and Prigogine I 1971 Thermodynamic Theory of Structure, Stability and Fluctuations(New York: Wiley-Interscience)

  • Goff J A 1949 Final Report of the Working Subcommittee of the International Joint Committee on Psychrometric Data Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Trans. 71 903–13

  • Goff J A 1960 There should be thermodynamic consistency in the construction and use of psychrometric charts ASHRAE J. 2 70–5

  • Goff J A and Gratch S 1945 Thermodynamic properties of moist air Am. Soc. Heat. Vent. Eng. Trans. 51 125–64

  • Greenspan L 1977 Humidity fixed points of binary saturated aqueous solutions J. Res. Natl. Bureau Stand. A 81 89–96

    CrossRef

  • Greenwald T J and Stephens G L 1995 Satellite Microwave Sensing of Oceanic Cloud Liquid Water: Application to the Earth Radiation Budget and Climate. Atmospheric Science Paper No. 572, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

  • Guyot A 1859 Tables, meteorological and physical prepared for the Smithsonian Institution 3rd edn (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution)

    CrossRef

  • Hamer W J and Wu Y-C 1972 Osmotic coefficients and mean activity coefficients of uni-univalent electrolytes in water at 25 °C J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1 1047–99

    CrossRef

  • Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R, Lo K, Lea D W and Medina-Elizade M 2006 Global temperature change Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 14288–93

    CrossRef

  • Hansen J E and Takahashi T (ed) 1984 Climate processes and climate sensitivity Geophysical Monograph Series vol 29 (Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union)

  • Harrison L P 1965 Humidity and Moisture, Volume 3—Fundamentals and Standards ed A Wexler (New York: Reinhold) pp 3–256

  • Hasegawa S and Little J W 1977 The NBS Two-Pressure Humidity Generator, Mark 2. J. Res. Natl. Bureau Stand. A 81 81–8

    CrossRef

  • Haug G H, Ganopolski A, Sigman D M, Rosell-Mele A, Swann G E A, Tiedemann R, Jaccard S L, Bollmann J, Maslin M A, Leng M J and Eglinton G 2005 North Pacific seasonality and the glaciation of North America 2.7 million years ago Nature 433 821–5

    CrossRef

  • Haug G H and Tiedemann R 1998 Effect of the formation of the Isthmus of Panama on Atlantic Ocean thermohaline circulation Nature 393 673–6

    CrossRef

  • Heinonen M 2002 A comparison of humidity standards at seven European national standards laboratories Metrologia 39 303–8

    IOPscience

  • Held I M and Shell K M 2012 Using relative humidity as a state variable in climate feedback analysis J. Clim. 25 2578–82

    CrossRef

  • Herrmann S, Kretzschmar H-J and and Gatley D P 2009 Thermodynamic properties of real moist air, dry air, steam, water, and ice ASHRAE RP-1485 (Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers Inc.)

  • Hintsa E J, Weinstock E M, Anderson J G, May R D and Hurst D F 1999 On the accuracy of in situ water vapor measurements in the troposphere and lower stratosphere with the Harvard Lyman-α hygrometer J. Geophys. Res. 104 8183–9

    CrossRef

  • Hintsa E J, Weinstock E M, Dessler A E, Anderson J G, Loewenstein M and Podolske J R 1994 SPADE H2O measurements and the seasonal cycle of stratospheric water vapor Geophys. Res. Lett. 21 2559–62

    CrossRef

  • Hocke K, Martin L and Kämpfer N 2013 Survey of intercomparisons of water vapour measurements Monitoring Atmospheric Water Vapour ed N Kämpfer (Berlin: Springer) pp 243–88

    CrossRef

  • Holland R G and Stöhr G 2011 Geschichte der Hygrometer. Eine Zeitreise durch die Jahrhunderte.(Riedlingen: Schirmerdruck)

  • Hurst D F et al 1999 Closure of the total hydrogen budget of the northern extratropical lower stratosphere J. Geophys. Res. 104 8191–200

    CrossRef

  • Hyland R W 1975 A correlation for the second interaction virial coefficients and enhancement factors for moist air J. Res. Natl. Bureau Stand. A 79 551–60

    CrossRef

  • IAPWS 1992 Revised Supplementary Release on Saturation Properties of Ordinary Water Substance The International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam www.iapws.org

  • IAPWS 2011 Revised Release on the Pressure along the Melting and Sublimation Curves of Ordinary Water Substance The International Association for the Properties of Water and Steamwww.iapws.org

  • IAPWS 2015 Guideline on a Virial Equation for the Fugacity of H2O in Humid Air The International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam www.iapws.org

  • IMC 1996 A Guide to the Measurement of Humidity (London: The Institute of Measurement and Control) ISBN: 0-904457-24-9

  • Ingersoll A P 1969 The runaway greenhouse: a history of water on Venus J. Atmos. Sci. 26 1191–8

    CrossRef

  • Ingersoll A P 2013 Planetary Climates (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)

    CrossRef

  • Ingram W 2010 A very simple model for the water vapour feedback on climate change Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 136 30–40

    CrossRef

  • IOC, SCOR and IAPSO 2010 The international thermodynamic equation of seawater—2010: Calculation and use of thermodynamic properties 196 Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, Manuals and Guides No. 56, UNESCO (English) http://www.TEOS-10.org

  • IPCC 2013 ed T F Stocker et al Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/

  • IUPAC 2006 Compendium of Chemical Terminology (the ‘Gold Book’) 2nd edn ed A D McNaught and A Wilkinson (Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications) (XML on-line corrected version:http://goldbook.iupac.org (2006-) created by M Nic, J Jirat and B Kosata; updates compiled by A Jenkins)

  • Jacobson M Z 2005 Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    CrossRef

  • Jasechko S, Sharp Z D, Gibson J J, Birks S J, Yi Y and Fawcett P J 2013 Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration Nature 496 347–50

    CrossRef

  • Johnston H S and Solomon S 1979 Thunderstorms as possible micrometeorological sink for stratospheric water J. Geophys. Res. 84 3155–8

    CrossRef

  • Josey S A, Gulev S and Yu L 2013 Exchanges through the ocean surface Ocean Circulation and Climate. A 21st Century Perspective ed G Siedler et al (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp 115–40

    CrossRef

  • Josey S A, Kent E C and Taylor P K 1999 New insights into the ocean heat budget closure problem from analysis of the SOC air–sea flux climatology J. Clim. 12 2856–80

    CrossRef

  • Kämpfer N (ed) 2013 Monitoring Atmospheric Water Vapour. Ground-based Remote Sensing and In-situ Methods (ISSI Scientific Report Series vol 10) (New York: Springer)

    CrossRef

  • Kara A B, Hurlburt H E and Loh W-Y 2007 Which near-surface atmospheric variable drives air-sea temperature differences over the global ocean? J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean 112 C05020

    CrossRef

  • Katsaros K 2001 Evaporation and humidity: Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences vol 2 (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp 870–7

    CrossRef

  • Kintisch E 2014 Climate outsider finds missing global warming Science 344 348

    CrossRef

  • Kleeman R and Power S B 1995 A simple atmospheric model of surface heat flux for use in ocean modeling studies J. Phys. Oceanogr. 25 92–105

    CrossRef

  • 2000 SPARC assessment of upper tropospheric and stratospheric water vapour. 312 SPARC Report No 2 WCRP-No. 113, WMO/TD-No 1043

  • Kley D, Stone E J, Henderson W R, Drummond J W, Harrop W J, Schmeltekopf A L, Thompson T L and Winkler R H 1979 In situ measurements of the mixing ratio of water vapor in the stratosphereJ. Atmos. Sci. 36 2513–24

    CrossRef

  • Komabayasi M 1967 Discrete equilibrium temperatures of a hypothetical planet with the atmosphere and the hydrosphere of one component-two phase system under constant solar radiation J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan 45 137–8

  • Kosaka Y and Xie S-P 2013 Recent global-warming hiatus tied to equatorial Pacific surface coolingNature 501 403–7

    CrossRef

  • Kraus E B 1972 Atmosphere–Ocean Interaction (Oxford: Clarendon)

  • Kraus E B and Businger J A 1994 Atmosphere–Ocean Interaction (New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press/Clarendon)

  • Kusuda T 1965 Calculation of the temperature of a flat-plate wet surface under adiabatic conditions with respect to the Lewis relation Humidity and Moisture vol I Principles and Methods of Measuring Humidity in Gases ed R E Ruskin (New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation) pp 16–32

  • Lacis A A, Schmidt G A, Rind D and Ruedy R A 2010 Atmospheric CO2: principal control knob governing Earth’s temperature Science 330 356–9

    CrossRef

  • Laliberté F, Zika J, Mudryk L, Kushner P J, Kjellsson J and Döös K 2015 Constrained work output of the moist atmospheric heat engine in a warming climate Science 347 540–3

    CrossRef

  • Lamquin N, Gierens K, Stubenrauch C J and Chatterjee R 2009 Evaluation of upper tropospheric humidity forecasts from ECMWF using AIRS and CALIPSO data Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9 1779–93

    CrossRef

  • Landau L D and Lifschitz E M 1974 Hydrodynamik (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag)

  • Lea D W 2015 Palaeoclimate: climate sensitivity in a warmer world Nature 518 46–7

    CrossRef

  • Leiterer U, Dier H, Nagel D and Naebert T 2005 Correction method for RS80-A Humicap humidity profiles and their validation by lidar backscattering profiles in tropical cirrus clouds J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 22 18–29

    CrossRef

  • Le Treut H, Somerville R, Cubasch U, Ding Y, Mauritzen C, Mokssit A, Peterson T and Prather M 2007 Historical overview of climate change ed S Solomon et al Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter1.pdf

  • Lewis G N 1900 A new conception of thermal pressure and a theory of solutions Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 36 145–68

    CrossRef

  • Lewis G N 1901a The law of physico-chemical change Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 37 49–69

    CrossRef

  • Lewis G N 1901b Das Gesetz physiko-chemischer Vorgänge Z. Phys. Chem., Lpz 38 205–26

  • Lewis G N and Randall M 1923 Thermodynamics and the Free Energy of Chemical Substances(New York: McGraw-Hill)

  • Lewis G N and Randall M 1961 Thermodynamics (New York: McGraw-Hill)

  • Li J and Chylek P 2012 Atmospheric entropy. Part I: climate dissipation structure J. Clim. 253173–90

    CrossRef

  • Li Y, Gu W, Chao J, Li L, Liu C, Xu Y, Chang Z, Wu L and Chen J 2015 Atmospheric parameters affecting sea ice losses in the context of gravity desalination Theor. Appl. Climatol. 121 685–93

    CrossRef

  • Li J, Sun C and Jin F-F 2013 NAO implicated as a predictor of Northern Hemisphere mean temperature multidecadal variability Geophys. Res. Lett. 40 5497–502

    CrossRef

  • List R J 1951 Smithsonian Meteorological Tables 6th revised edn (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution)

  • Liu W T and Niiler P P 1990 The sensitivity of latent heat flux to the air humidity approximations used in ocean circulation models J. Geophys. Res. 95 9745–53

    CrossRef

  • Loncin M, Bimbenet J J and Lenges J 1968 Influence of the activity of water on the spoilage of foodstuffs Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 3 131–42

    CrossRef

  • Lovell-Smith J W 2006 On correlation in the water vapour pressure formulations. Metrologia 43556–60

    IOPscience

  • Lovell-Smith J W 2009 The propagation of uncertainty for humidity calculations Metrologia 46607–15

    IOPscience

  • Lovell-Smith J W 2012 Modification of vapor-pressure reference functions to include parameter covariance Int. J. Thermophys. 33 1390–407

    CrossRef

  • Lovell-Smith J W and Pearson H 2006 On the concept of relative humidity Metrologia 43 129–34

    IOPscience

  • Macdonald A M and Baringer M O 2013 Ocean heat transport Ocean Circulation and Climate. A 21st Century Perspective ed G Siedler (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp 759–85

    CrossRef

  • Mackrodt P 2012 A new attempt on a coulometric trace humidity generator Int. J. Thermophys. 331520–35

    CrossRef

  • Marotzke J and Forster P M 2015 Forcing, feedback and internal variability in global temperature trends Nature 517 565–70

    CrossRef

  • Martínez-Botí M A, Foster G L, Chalk T B, Rohling E J, Sexton P F, Lunt D J, Pancost R D, Badger M P S and Schmidt D N 2015 Plio-Pleistocene climate sensitivity evaluated using high-resolution CO2 records Nature 518 49–54

    CrossRef

  • Mathlouthi M 2001 Water content, water activity, water structure and the stability of foodstuffsFood Control 12 409–17

    CrossRef

  • Maxwell J C 1874 Van der Waals on the continuity of the gaseous and liquid states Nature 10477–80

    CrossRef

  • McDonald J E 1963 Intermolecular attractions and saturation vapor pressure J. Atmos. Sci. 20178–80

    CrossRef

  • Meyer C W and Harvey A H 2015 Dew-point measurements for water in compressed carbon dioxide AIChE J. 61 2913–25

    CrossRef

  • Meyer C W, Miller W W, Ripple D C and Scace G E 2012 Uncertainty budget for the NIST hybrid humidity generator Int. J. Thermophys. 33 1488–99

    CrossRef

  • Miller J F 1851 On the relation of the air and evaporation temperatures to the temperature of the dew-point, as determined by Mr Glaisher’s hygrometrical tables, founded on the factors deduced from the six-hourly observations made at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 141 141–8

    CrossRef

  • Miloshevich L M, Vömel H, Paukkunen A, Heymsfield A J and Oltmans S J 2001 Characterization and correction of relative humidity measurements from Vaisala RS80-A radiosondes at cold temperatures J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 18 135–56

    CrossRef

  • Miloshevich L M, Vömel H, Whiteman D N, Lesht B M, Schmidlin F J and Russo F 2006 Absolute accuracy of water vapor measurements from six operational radiosonde types launched during AWEX-G and implications for AIRS validation J. Geophys. Res. 111 D09510

    CrossRef

  • Mitchell J F B 1989 The ‘greenhouse’ effect and climate change Rev. Geophys. 27 115–39

    CrossRef

  • Möller D 2008 On the history of the scientific exploration of fog, dew, rain and other atmospheric water Special Issue: Fog Research DIE ERDE 139 11–44

  • Molyneux W 1685 A letter from William Molyneux Esq; sec. of the Dublin Society; to one of the S. of the R. S. concerning a new hygroscope, invented by him Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 15 1032–5

    CrossRef

  • Mote P W, Rosenlof K H, McIntyre M E, Carr E S, Gille J C, Holton J R, Kinnersley J S, Pumphrey H C, Russel J M III and Waters J W 1996 An atmospheric tape recorder: the imprint of tropical tropopause temperatures on stratospheric water vapor J. Geophys. Res. 101 3989–4006

    CrossRef

  • Mulligan J F and Hertz H G 1997 An unpublished lecture by Heinrich Hertz: ‘On the energy balance of the Earth’ Am. J. Phys. 65 36–45

    CrossRef

  • Nagel D, Leiterer U, Dier H, Kats A, Reichardt J and Behrendt A 2001 High accuracy humidity measurements using the standardized frequency method with a research upper-air sounding system Meteorol. Z. 10 395–405

    CrossRef

  • Newell R E and Gould-Stewart S 1981 A stratospheric fountain? J. Atmos. Sci. 38 2789–96

    CrossRef

  • NF X 15–110 1994 Measurement of air moisture. Hydrometric parameters—Mesure de l’humidité de l’air—Parametres hygrométriques July, www.boutique.afnor.org/standard/nf-x15-110/measurement-of-air-moisture-hydrometric-parameters/article/771320/fa037684

  • OMI 1951 Values of some physical functions and constants used in meteorology. Definitions and specifications of water vapour in the atmosphere Organisation Météorologique InternationalePublication 79, Lausanne

  • Ort D R and Long S P 2014 Limits on yields in the corn belt Science 344 484–5

    CrossRef

  • Ovarlez J, Gayet J-F, Gierens K, Ström J, Ovarlez H, Auriol F, Busen R and Schumann U 2002 Water vapour measurements inside cirrus clouds on Northern and Southern hemispheres during INCAGeophys. Res. Lett. 29 60-1 to 60-4

    CrossRef

  • Paltridge G, Arking A and Pook M 2009 Trends in middle- and upper-level tropospheric humidity from NCEP reanalysis data Theor. Appl. Climatol. 98 351–59

    CrossRef

  • Pawlowicz R, Feistel R, McDougall T J, Ridout P, Seitz S and Wolf H 2016 Metrological challenges for measurements of key climatological observables. Part 2: oceanic salinity Metrologia 53 R12–R25

    IOPscience

  • Peixoto J P and Oort A H 1992 Physics of Climate (New York: American Institute of Physics)

  • Peixoto J P and Oort A H 1996 The climatology of relative humidity in the atmosphere J. Clim. 93443–63

    CrossRef

  • Peter T, Marcolli C, Spichtinger P, Corti T, Baker M B and Koop T 2006 When dry air is too humidScience 314 1399–402

    CrossRef

  • Pierce D W, Barnett T P and Gleckler P J 2011 Ocean circulations, heat budgets, and future commitment to climate change Annu. Rev. Environ. Resources 36 27–43

    CrossRef

  • Pierce D W, Gleckler P J, Barnett T P, Santer B D and Durack P J 2012 The fingerprint of human-induced changes in the ocean’s salinity and temperature fields Geophys. Res. Lett. 39 L21704

    CrossRef

  • Pierrehumbert R T 1996 Some remarks on mechanisms for the regulation of tropical sea surface temperature Clouds, Chemistry and Climate (NATO ASI Series I vol 35) ed P J Crutzen (Berlin: Springer) pp 153–72 http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/papers/NATO_SST/NATO_SST.pdf

  • Pierrehumbert R T 2010 Principles of Planetary Climate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    CrossRef

  • Poan D E, Roehrig R, Couvreux F and Lafore J-P 2013 West African monsoon intraseasonal variability: a precipitable water perspective J. Atmos. Sci. 70 1035–52

    CrossRef

  • Poynting J H 1881 Change of state: solid-liquid Phil. Mag. 12 32–48

    CrossRef

  • Prescott J A and Collins J A 1951 The lag of temperature behind solar radiation Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 77 121–6

    CrossRef

  • Pruppacher H R and Klett J D 1997 Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation. Second Revised and Enlarged Edition with an Introduction to Cloud Chemistry and Cloud Electricity (Dordrecht/Boston, MA/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers)

  • Quaas J 2012 Evaluating the ‘critical relative humidity’ as a measure of subgrid-scale variability of humidity in general circulation model cloud cover parameterizations using satellite data J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 117 D09208

    CrossRef

  • Randall D 2012 Atmosphere, Clouds, and Climate (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)

  • Randel D L, Greenwald T L, Vonder Haar T H, Stephens G L, Ringerud M A and Combs C L 1996 A new global water vapor dataset Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77 1233–46

    CrossRef

  • Rantala M J 2007 Evolution of nakedness in Homo sapiens J. Zool. 273 1–7

    CrossRef

  • Regnault V 1845 Hygrometrical Researches, Scientific Memoirs selected from the transactions of foreign academies of science and learned academies and from foreign journals V4 ed R Taylor 606–60 (1846)

  • Reid P C and Valdés L 2011 ICES status report on climate change in the North Atlantic. ICES Cooperative Research Report 310 www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/226286.pdf

  • Retallack B J 1973 Compendium of Meteorology; For Use by Class I and II Meteorological Personnel (Physical Meteorology Training Manual Series) vol I No 364 Part 2

  • Robinson R A and Sinclair D A 1934 The activity coefficients of the alkali chlorides and of lithium iodide in aqueous solution from vapor pressure measurements J. Am. Chem. Soc. 56 1830–5

    CrossRef

  • Rogers R R and Yau M K 1989 Short Course in Cloud Physics 3rd edn (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann)

  • Romps D M and Kuang Z 2010 Do undiluted convective plumes exist in the upper tropical troposphere? J. Atmos. Sci. 67 468–84

    CrossRef

  • Rosenlof K H et al 2001 Stratospheric water vapor increases over the past half-century Geophys. Res. Lett. 28 1195–8

    CrossRef

  • Santer B D et al 2007 Identification of human-induced changes in atmospheric moisture contentProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 15248–53

    CrossRef

  • Saunders P M 1967 The temperature at the ocean–air interface J. Atmos. Sci. 24 269–73

    CrossRef

  • Schiermeier Q 2015 Climatologists to physicists: your planet needs you Nature 520 140–1

    CrossRef

  • Schiraldi A, Fessas D and Signorelli M 2012 Water activity in biological systems—a review Polish J. Food Nutrition Sci. 62 5–13

    CrossRef

  • Schluessel P, Emery W J, Grassl H and Mammen T 1990 On the bulk-skin temperature difference and its impact on satellite remote sensing of sea surface temperature J. Geophys. Res. 9513341–56

    CrossRef

  • Schmidt G A, Ruedy R A, Miller R L and Lacis A A 2010 Attribution of the present-day total greenhouse effect J. Geophys. Res. 115 D20106

    CrossRef

  • Schmidt H et al 2012 Solar irradiance reduction to counteract radiative forcing from a quadrupling of CO2: climate responses simulated by four earth system models Earth Syst. Dyn. 3 63–78

    CrossRef

  • Schneider T, O’Gorman P A and Levine X J 2010 Water vapor and the dynamics of climate changes Rev. Geophys. 48 RG3001

    CrossRef

  • Schwartz S E 2007 Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth’s climate system J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 112 D24S05

    CrossRef

  • Scott W J 1958 The effect of residual water on the survival of dried bacteria during storage J. Gen. Microbiol. 19 624–33

    CrossRef

  • Seidel D J 2002 Water Vapor: Distribution and Trends. Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change (New York: Wiley) http://eu.wiley.com/legacy/wileychi/egec/pdf/GB085-W.PDF

  • Shaw W N 1889 Report on hygrometric methods: first part, including the saturation method and the chemical method, and dew-point instruments Phil. Trans. A 179 73–149

    CrossRef

  • Sherwood S C, Ingram W, Tsushima Y, Satoh M, Roberts M, Vidale P L and O’Gorman P A 2010 Relative humidity changes in a warmer climate J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 115 D09104

    CrossRef

  • Smagorinsky J 1960 On the dynamical prediction of large-scale condensation by numerical methods Geophys. Monogr. 5 71–8

  • Soares P C 2010 Warming power of CO2 and H2O: correlations with temperature changes Int. J. Geosci. 1 102–12

    CrossRef

  • Solomon S 1988 The mystery of the Antarctic Ozone ‘Hole’ Rev. Geophys. 26 131–48

    CrossRef

  • Sonntag D 1966 Hygrometrie (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag)

  • Spivakovsky C M et al 2000 Three-dimensional climatological distribution of tropospheric OH: update and evaluation J. Geophys. Res. 105 8931–80

    CrossRef

  • Sprung A 1888 Über die Bestimmung der Luftfeuchtigkeit mit Hilfe des Assmannschen Aspirationspsychrometers Das Wetter 5 105–8

  • Steinman B A, Mann M E and Miller S K 2015 Atlantic and Pacific multidecadal oscillations and Northern Hemisphere temperatures Science 347 988–90

    CrossRef

  • Stephens G L, Li J, Wild M, Clayson C A, Loeb N, Kato S, L’Ecuyer T, Stackhouse P W, Lebsock M and Andrews T 2012 An update on Earth’s energy balance in light of the latest global observationsNature Geosci. 5 691–6

    CrossRef

  • Stevens B and Bony S 2013 What are climate models missing? Science 340 1053–4

    CrossRef

  • Stevens M and Bell S A 1992 The NPL standard humidity generator: an analysis of uncertainty by validation of individual component performance Meas. Sci. Technol. 3 943–52

    IOPscience

  • Sugiyama M, Stone P H and Emanuel K A 2005 The role of relative humidity in radiative–convective equilibrium J. Atmos. Sci. 62 2001–11

    CrossRef

  • Sundqvist H 1978 A parameterization scheme for non-convective condensation including prediction of cloud water content Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 104 677–90

    CrossRef

  • Teitelbaum H, Moustaoui M, Basdevant C and Holton J R 2000 An alternative mechanism explaining the hygropause formation in tropical regions Geophys. Res. Lett. 27 221–4

    CrossRef

  • Tollefsen J 2012 Climate forecasting: a break in the clouds Nature 485 164–6

    CrossRef

  • Tollefsen J 2014 Climate change: the case of the missing heat Nature 505 276–8

    CrossRef

  • Tompkins A M, Gierens K and Rädel G 2007 Ice supersaturation in the ECMWF integrated forecast system Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 133 53–63

    CrossRef

  • Trenberth K E, Fasullo J T and Kiehl J 2009 Earth’s global energy budget Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.90 311–23

    CrossRef

  • Trenberth K E et al 2007 Observations: surface and atmospheric climate change ed S Solomon et al Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changewww.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter3-supp-material.pdf

  • Van der Waals J D 1873 Over de Continuiteit van den Gas- en Vloeistoftoestand PhD ThesisLeiden University, The Netherlands

  • van Hooidonk R and Huber M 2009 Equivocal evidence for a thermostat and unusually low levels of coral bleaching in the Western Pacific Warm Pool Geophys. Res. Lett. 36 L06705

    CrossRef

  • VDI/VDE 3514 2007 Measurement of humidity—Characteristics and symbols. VDI VDE-Gesellschaft Mess- und Automatisierungstechnik (GMA) Fachausschuss Gasfeuchtemessung

  • VIM 2012 International vocabulary of metrology—Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM) 3rd edn JCGM 200:2012, www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/vim.html

  • Wang X et al 2014 A two-fold increase of carbon cycle sensitivity to tropical temperature variationsNature 506 212–15

    CrossRef

  • Wagner W and Pruss A 1993 International equations for the saturation properties of ordinary water substance—revised according to the International Temperature Scale of 1990 Addendum to Journal of Physical Chemical Reference Data 16, 893 (1987) J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 22 783–7

    CrossRef

  • Wagner W, Riethmann T, Feistel R and Harvey A H 2011 New equations for the sublimation pressure and melting pressure of H2O ice Ih J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 40 043103

    CrossRef

  • Warren S G, Eastman R M and Hahn C J 2007 A survey of changes in cloud cover and cloud types over land from surface observations 1971–96 J. Clim. 20 717–38

    CrossRef

  • Webster C R, May R D, Trimble C A, Chave R G and Kendall J 1994 Aircraft (ER-2) laser infrared absorption spectrometer (ALIAS) for in-situ stratospheric measurements of HCl, N2O, CH4, NO2, and HNO3 Appl. Opt. 33 454–72

    CrossRef

  • Wells N C 2012 The Atmosphere and Ocean (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell)

  • Wexler A and Hyland R W 1983 Thermodynamic properties of dry air, moist air and water and SI psychrometric charts ASHRAE ed A Wexler pp 150–303 (Project 216-RP)

  • Wielicki B A, Wong T, Loeb N, Minnis P, Priestley K and Kandel R 2005 Changes in Earth’s albedo measured by satellite Science 308 825

    CrossRef

  • Willett K M, Williams C N Jr, Dunn R J H, Thorne P W, Bell S, de Podesta M, Jones P D and Parker D E 2013 HadISDH: an updateable land surface specific humidity product for climate monitoringClim. Past 9 657–77

    CrossRef

  • Wisniak J 2001 Historical development of the vapor pressure equation from Dalton to Antoine J. Phase Equilib. 22 622–30

    CrossRef

  • WMO 1966 International Meteorological Tables ed S Letestu WMO-No. 188.TP.94

  • WMO 2008 Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation 7th edn (Geneva: World Meteorological Organization)www.wmo.int/pages/prog/gcos/documents/gruanmanuals/CIMO/CIMO_Guide-7th_Edition-2008.pdf

  • Worley S J, Woodruff S D, Reynolds R W, Lubker S J and Lott N 2005 ICOADS release 2.1 data and products Int. J. Climatol. 25 823–42

    CrossRef

  • Worrall R W 1965 Psychrometric determination of relative humidities in air with dry-bulb temperatures exceeding 212°F Humidity and Moisture, Volume 1—Principles and methods of measuring humidity in gases ed R E Ruskin (New York: Reinhold) pp 105–9

  • Wright D G, Feistel R, Reissmann J H, Miyagawa K, Jackett D R, Wagner W, Overhoff U, Guder C, Feistel A and Marion G M 2010 Numerical implementation and oceanographic application of the thermodynamic potentials of liquid water, water vapour, ice, seawater and humid air—Part 2. The library routines